Contextualising the developability risk of antibodies with lambda light chains using enhanced therapeutic antibody profiling.

Antibodies with lambda light chains (λ-antibodies) are generally considered to be less developable than those with kappa light chains (κ-antibodies). Though this hypothesis has not been formally established, it has led to substantial systematic biases in drug discovery pipelines and thus contributed to kappa dominance amongst clinical-stage therapeutics. However, the identification of increasing numbers of epitopes preferentially engaged by λ-antibodies shows there is a functional cost to neglecting to consider them as potential lead candidates. Here, we update our Therapeutic Antibody Profiler (TAP) tool to use the latest data and machine learning-based structure prediction, and apply it to evaluate developability risk profiles for κ-antibodies and λ-antibodies based on their surface physicochemical properties. We find that while human λ-antibodies on average have a higher risk of developability issues than κ-antibodies, a sizeable proportion are assigned lower-risk profiles by TAP and should represent more tractable candidates for therapeutic development. Through a comparative analysis of the low- and high-risk populations, we highlight opportunities for strategic design that TAP suggests would enrich for more developable λ-antibodies. Overall, we provide context to the differing developability of κ- and λ-antibodies, enabling a rational approach to incorporate more diversity into the initial pool of immunotherapeutic candidates.

A Small Step Toward Generalizability: Training a Machine Learning Scoring Function for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.

Over the past few years, many machine learning-based scoring functions for predicting the binding of small molecules to proteins have been developed. Their objective is to approximate the distribution which takes two molecules as input and outputs the energy of their interaction. Only a scoring function that accounts for the interatomic interactions involved in binding can accurately predict binding affinity on unseen molecules. However, many scoring functions make predictions based on data set biases rather than an understanding of the physics of binding. These scoring functions perform well when tested on similar targets to those in the training set but fail to generalize to dissimilar targets. To test what a machine learning-based scoring function has learned, input attribution, a technique for learning which features are important to a model when making a prediction on a particular data point, can be applied. If a model successfully learns something beyond data set biases, attribution should give insight into the important binding interactions that are taking place. We built a machine learning-based scoring function that aimed to avoid the influence of bias via thorough train and test data set filtering and show that it achieves comparable performance on the Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions, 2016 (CASF-2016) benchmark to other leading methods. We then use the CASF-2016 test set to perform attribution and find that the bonds identified as important by PointVS, unlike those extracted from other scoring functions, have a high correlation with those found by a distance-based interaction profiler. We then show that attribution can be used to extract important binding pharmacophores from a given protein target when supplied with a number of bound structures. We use this information to perform fragment elaboration and see improvements in docking scores compared to using structural information from a traditional, data-based approach. This not only provides definitive proof that the scoring function has learned to identify some important binding interactions but also constitutes the first deep learning-based method for extracting structural information from a target for molecule design.